There are ‘mostly other directed’ and ‘mostly inner directed’ people, and any amount of research has shown that the latter are quite a small minority of the population at any given time. There is a kind of social magnetism which draws people into ‘going with the flow’, as in crowd behaviour at outdoor and indoor events. On such occasions personal perceptions and judgement are usually submerged in the collective response. Hence the old Spanish saying that shepherds may change, but sheep remain sheep. But however rugged one’s individuality, the fact is we are all social animals and therefore obliged to take some interest in the way our society is governed. Neglect of this responsibility leaves the field open to career politicians with the ingrained conceit that they know best what everybody else should be doing and what matters most in the world. They like to call this megalomania ‘leadership’, when all it usually amounts to is self-serving bossiness and exploitation of the gullible via largely complicit mass media.
So when you hear someone disclaiming any interest in politics, you are probably in the company of sheep. Such complacency is of course fostered by bland assurances that British democracy is designed to protect the public good and ensure our most cherished traditions and aspirations inform government policy. Added to which we have the opportunity to choose between main contenders for political office at approximately five-year intervals, thus giving us the kind of government most people want.
So much for the theory. What really happens is that, over the years, certain factions contrive to subordinate the public to an ‘Establishment’ deeply entrenched behind complex legalistic barricades, and with its own self-serving agenda and priorities.
All this takes place behind a façade of bogus ‘pluralism’, whereby ostensibly opposing parties actually make common cause of multi-racialism and surrender to the European Union. We thus find ourselves governed today by a coalition of traitors.
Always fearful of exposure as such, they use the mass media to keep the public diverted with popular entertainments, consumerism and foreign travel, while the freedom to dissent is stealthily removed via allegedly egalitarian legislation. And meanwhile any complaints of injustice will be referred to fellow lawyers with equally doubtful credentials as libertarians. The machinery of renegade government is then provided by a standing army of career bureaucrats, with jobs for life and generous pensions to protect, the while describing themselves unblushingly as ‘public servants’. All this, together with the enormously coercive power and influence of complicit mass media, has made the governance of Britain hard to distinguish from factory farming.
So what of the politically aware minority, with the nous to recognise and courage to resist this monstrous betrayal? There are now four relatively small groups purporting to be the authentic voice of British patriotism: the British National Party, the British Peoples’ Party, the Nationalist Alliance and the National Front , plus a few splinter groups of disgruntled ‘right wing’ Conservatives. Unable to agree on what defines British nationalism; with implacable opposition from the mass media; with meagre resources and crippling quasi-legal restrictions, there is no possibility at all of such people gaining access to government via the electoral process. In these circumstances, any ‘divide and rule’ tactics by the government become quite superfluous. Though much improved recently, nationalist websites on the Internet have scarcely exhibited the clarity of purpose, discipline and talents needed by serious contenders for public office. They can’t even agree on the defining fundamentals of British nationalism, let alone the means of realising their fulfilment. Worse, some of their correspondents seem keen to exemplify the characterisation of nationalists in the mass media as loutish, ignorant, illiterate and paranoid. With the best will in the world, therefore, the message to all nationalists deserving the name has to be: For God’s sake, get your act together, or kindly leave the stage.
It remains to determine the kind of strategy and tactics needed for national recovery, or at the very least to frustrate the present renegade government’s intentions. Since national elections are a blind alley, all campaigning resources must be concentrated on local government, especially in those areas under most pressure from immigrants.
With enough local government leverage, a national civil disobedience campaign could be mobilised while giving the nationalist message far more publicity and prominence than it could otherwise achieve. Meanwhile, those local politicians and officials seen to be agents of the renegade regime have to be targeted for intense harassment at every opportunity. They must be subjected to the ‘Renegade!’ accusation whenever and wherever they show themselves. Establishment censorship and barring of nationalist assemblies can also be circumvented by ‘gate-crashing’ all high profile renegade events, thus exploiting the media presence to our advantage. And spare us the balloon slogans about freedom, identity, democracy and security; let us instead see bold and unequivocal dedications such as
· Repatriation of all unwanted immigrants
· Self-government for the United Kingdom
· Maximum economic self-sufficiency
· Priority for the family
Ask yourself: how can anyone attack such declarations without exposing themselves as renegades? And how would the vast majority of British people respond on the doorstep to these four commitments? We only need four leaflets, setting out these fundamental policies in plain language, to shatter all the negative propaganda of renegade and alien opponents. And this still leaves us free to expose all the treacherous doctrines and activities of our opponents.
All this too much for you? Try to remember that those disinclined to exert themselves in defence of their heritage and homeland, and who see no further than the feeding-trough, are destined for the abattoirs of history.
F Kimbal Johnson
February 2006
Well, it is coming up to four years since this excellent article by Frank was written, and be honest with yourself, do you feel that as a movement we have made great strides forward since then? That power is within our grasp? Even local power?
I know, I'm a pain in the butt asking these awkward questions, making you reassess, making you think, making you put that video game controller down, or turn that tv off for a moment. But someone has to do it.
The answer of course is that we are still light years from gaining power in this country, and unless we all start pulling together, that dream will remain just that, a dream.
Frank mentions four small groups at that time, well if you are serious about politics, and serious about wanting to win, I'd say there are now only two groups to choose from, the BNP and the National Front.
Personally I feel there won't be any big improvements until we are down to one, with everyone standing shoulder to shoulder and pulling together.
Which one I hear you say. Well that is the $64,000 question, and to be honest it isn't as clear cut as it at first seems. I'll be making some comparisons in the New Year which may help you decide, but until then digest this article and give a little thought to where you want nationalism to go in this coming new year, and what you personally are prepared to do to help.
Bear in mind that no one can afford the luxury of fence sitting any longer if they are in earnest about taking this country back, as time, the steady relinquishing of sovereignty, and demographic considerations rule that out.
So, will it be a new dawn for you and British nationalism, or just the same old same old?
It's resolution time!
Happy New Year!
No comments:
Post a Comment